Despite the vast body of literature on Active Learning (AL), there is no comprehensive and open benchmark allowing for efficient and simple comparison of proposed samplers. Additionally, the variability in experimental settings across the literature makes it difficult to choose a sampling strategy, which is critical due to the one-off nature of AL experiments. To address those limitations, we introduce OpenAL, a flexible and open-source framework to easily run and compare sampling AL strategies on a collection of realistic tasks. The proposed benchmark is augmented with interpretability metrics and statistical analysis methods to understand when and why some samplers outperform others. Last but not least, practitioners can easily extend the benchmark by submitting their own AL samplers.

Active Learning (AL) is an active domain of research, but is seldom used in the industry despite the pressing needs. This is in part due to a misalignment of objectives, while research strives at getting the best results on selected datasets, the industry wants guarantees that Active Learning will perform consistently and at least better than random labeling. The very one-off nature of Active Learning makes it crucial to understand how strategy selection can be carried out and what drives poor performance (lack of exploration, selection of samples that are too hard to classify, ...). To help rebuild trust of industrial practitioners in Active Learning, we present various actionable metrics. Through extensive experiments on reference datasets such as CIFAR100, Fashion-MNIST, and 20Newsgroups, we show that those metrics brings interpretability to AL strategies that can be leveraged by the practitioner.